History log of /openssl/test/dtlstest.c (Results 1 – 25 of 39)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# da1c088f 07-Sep-2023 Matt Caswell

Copyright year updates


Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Release: yes


# 2913b5c0 09-May-2023 Dimitri Papadopoulos <3234522+DimitriPapadopoulos@users.noreply.github.com>

DLTS → DTLS

Fix a typo that is confusing for newcomers.

CLA: trivial

Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Revi

DLTS → DTLS

Fix a typo that is confusing for newcomers.

CLA: trivial

Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20909)

show more ...


# 8189fe24 28-Mar-2023 Matt Caswell

Add a test for an app data record appearing before epoch change in DTLS

We had a test for a handshake record appearing before epoch change, and
a test for an app data record appearing be

Add a test for an app data record appearing before epoch change in DTLS

We had a test for a handshake record appearing before epoch change, and
a test for an app data record appearing before Finished - but not one for
the app data record appearing before epoch change.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20628)

show more ...


# a29ad912 23-Jun-2022 Matt Caswell

Add additional messages to the DTLS dropped records test

Ensure we are testing a handshake that includes a HelloVerifyRequest and
what happens if we drop it.

Reviewed-by: Tomas

Add additional messages to the DTLS dropped records test

Ensure we are testing a handshake that includes a HelloVerifyRequest and
what happens if we drop it.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18654)

show more ...


# 26dad42e 11-Apr-2022 Matt Caswell

Add a DTLSv1_listen() test

Add a test to ensure that a connection started via DTLSv1_listen() can
be completed through to handshake success. Previous DTLSv1_listen()
testing only tes

Add a DTLSv1_listen() test

Add a test to ensure that a connection started via DTLSv1_listen() can
be completed through to handshake success. Previous DTLSv1_listen()
testing only tested the function itself and did not confirm that a
connection can actually be achieved using it.

This is important to test some codepaths being affected by the record layer
refactor.

Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18132)

show more ...


# 4000827f 25-Jul-2022 Matt Caswell

Test that swapping the first app data record with Finished msg works

If the first app data record arrives before the Finished message we should
be able to buffer it and move on to the Fi

Test that swapping the first app data record with Finished msg works

If the first app data record arrives before the Finished message we should
be able to buffer it and move on to the Finished message.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18868)

show more ...


# a6843e6a 22-Jul-2022 Matt Caswell

Fix no-dtls1_2

dtlstest.c needs some adjusting to handle no-dtls1_2 since commit
7bf2e4d7f0c banned DTLSv1 at the default security level - causing the
test to fail.

Reviewed

Fix no-dtls1_2

dtlstest.c needs some adjusting to handle no-dtls1_2 since commit
7bf2e4d7f0c banned DTLSv1 at the default security level - causing the
test to fail.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18848)

show more ...


# e1c153d3 17-Jun-2022 Matt Caswell

Add a DTLS next epoch test

Test that if we receive a packet from the next epoch, we can buffer it
and still use it.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: T

Add a DTLS next epoch test

Test that if we receive a packet from the next epoch, we can buffer it
and still use it.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18601)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha17, openssl-3.0.0-alpha16
# aff636a4 06-May-2021 Matt Caswell

Update copyright year

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15181)


# fdf31270 27-Apr-2021 Matt Caswell

Adjust dtlstest for SHA1 security level

SHA1 is now in security level 0. SHA1 is required for DTLSv1.1. Therefore
dtlstest needed some adjustments in the event that DTLSv1.2 is disabled.

Adjust dtlstest for SHA1 security level

SHA1 is now in security level 0. SHA1 is required for DTLSv1.1. Therefore
dtlstest needed some adjustments in the event that DTLSv1.2 is disabled.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15047)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha15
# e9b30d9f 19-Apr-2021 Matt Caswell

Test a Finished message at the wrong time results in unexpected message

We test that sending a Finished message instead of a ClientHello results
in an unexpected message error.

Test a Finished message at the wrong time results in unexpected message

We test that sending a Finished message instead of a ClientHello results
in an unexpected message error.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14930)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha14, OpenSSL_1_1_1k, openssl-3.0.0-alpha13, openssl-3.0.0-alpha12, OpenSSL_1_1_1j, openssl-3.0.0-alpha11, openssl-3.0.0-alpha10, OpenSSL_1_1_1i
# 20f8bc72 29-Nov-2020 Dr. David von Oheimb

test cleanup: move helper .c and .h files to test/helpers/

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13568)


# cbb85bda 27-Nov-2020 Matt Caswell

Fix builds that specify both no-dh and no-ec

Various sections of code assumed that at least one of dh or ec would be
available. We also now also need to handle cases where a provider has

Fix builds that specify both no-dh and no-ec

Various sections of code assumed that at least one of dh or ec would be
available. We also now also need to handle cases where a provider has
a key exchange algorithm and TLS-GROUP that we don't know about.

Fixes #13536

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13549)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha9, openssl-3.0.0-alpha8
# 33c39a06 21-Oct-2020 Matt Caswell

Add a test for the various ways of setting temporary DH params

We support a number of different ways of setting temporary DH params. We
should test that they all work correctly.

Add a test for the various ways of setting temporary DH params

We support a number of different ways of setting temporary DH params. We
should test that they all work correctly.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13368)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha7, OpenSSL_1_1_1h, openssl-3.0.0-alpha6, openssl-3.0.0-alpha5, openssl-3.0.0-alpha4, openssl-3.0.0-alpha3, openssl-3.0.0-alpha2, openssl-3.0.0-alpha1
# 33388b44 23-Apr-2020 Matt Caswell

Update copyright year

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11616)


Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_1_1g, OpenSSL_1_1_1f
# 5e30f2fd 18-Mar-2020 Matt Caswell

Use a non-default libctx in sslapitest

We also don't load the default provider into the default libctx to make
sure there is no accidental "leakage".

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pau

Use a non-default libctx in sslapitest

We also don't load the default provider into the default libctx to make
sure there is no accidental "leakage".

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11508)

show more ...


Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_1_1e
# 8d242823 30-Jan-2020 Matt Caswell

Fix common test framework options

PR#6975 added the ability to our test framework to have common options to
all tests. For example providing the option "-test 5" to one of our test
p

Fix common test framework options

PR#6975 added the ability to our test framework to have common options to
all tests. For example providing the option "-test 5" to one of our test
programs will just run test number 5. This can be useful when debugging
tests.

Unforuntately this does not work well for a number of tests. In particular
those tests that call test_get_argument() without first skipping over these
common test options will not get the expected value. Some tests did this
correctly but a large number did not.

A helper function is introduced, test_skip_common_options(), to make this
easier for those tests which do not have their own specialised test option
handling, but yet still need to call test_get_argument(). This function
call is then added to all those tests that need it.

Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10975)

show more ...


# 5fd72d96 12-Jan-2020 Kurt Roeckx

Replace apps/server.pem with certificate with a sha256 signature.

It replaces apps/server.pem that used a sha1 signature with a copy of
test/certs/servercert.pem that is uses sha256.

Replace apps/server.pem with certificate with a sha256 signature.

It replaces apps/server.pem that used a sha1 signature with a copy of
test/certs/servercert.pem that is uses sha256.

This caused the dtlstest to start failing. It's testing connection
sbetween a dtls client and server. In particular it was checking that if
we drop a record that the handshake recovers and still completes
successfully. The test iterates a number of times. The first time
through it drops the first record. The second time it drops the second
one, and so on. In order to do this it has a hard-coded value for the
expected number of records it should see in a handshake. That's ok
because we completely control both sides of the handshake and know what
records we expect to see. Small changes in message size would be
tolerated because that is unlikely to have an impact on the number of
records. Larger changes in message size however could increase or
decrease the number of records and hence cause the test to fail.

This particular test uses a mem bio which doesn't have all the CTRLs
that the dgram BIO has. When we are using a dgram BIO we query that BIO
to determine the MTU size. The smaller the MTU the more fragmented
handshakes become. Since the mem BIO doesn't report an MTU we use a
rather small default value and get quite a lot of records in our
handshake. This has the tendency to increase the likelihood of the
number of records changing in the test if the message size changes.

It so happens that the new server certificate is smaller than the old
one. AFAICT this is probably because the DNs for the Subject and Issuer
are significantly shorter than previously. The result is that the number
of records used to transmit the Certificate message is one less than it
was before. This actually has a knock on impact for subsequent messages
and how we fragment them resulting in one less ServerKeyExchange record
too (the actual size of the ServerKeyExchange message hasn't changed,
but where in that message it gets fragmented has). In total the number
of records used in the handshake has decreased by 2 with the new
server.pem file.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
GH: #10784

show more ...


Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_0_2u, OpenSSL_1_0_2t, OpenSSL_1_1_0l, OpenSSL_1_1_1d
# c2969ff6 02-Jul-2019 Antoine Cœur

Fix Typos

CLA: trivial

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/ope

Fix Typos

CLA: trivial

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9288)

show more ...


Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_1_1c, OpenSSL_1_1_0k, OpenSSL_1_0_2s, OpenSSL_1_0_2r, OpenSSL_1_1_1b, OpenSSL_1_0_2q, OpenSSL_1_1_0j, OpenSSL_1_1_1a, OpenSSL_1_1_1, OpenSSL_1_1_1-pre9
# a43ce58f 16-Aug-2018 Shane Lontis

Updated test command line parsing to support commmon commands

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://gi

Updated test command line parsing to support commmon commands

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6975)

show more ...


# 80c455d5 18-Jan-2019 Matt Caswell

Make sure we trigger retransmits in DTLS testing

During a DTLS handshake we may need to periodically handle timeouts in the
DTLS timer to ensure retransmits due to lost packets are perfo

Make sure we trigger retransmits in DTLS testing

During a DTLS handshake we may need to periodically handle timeouts in the
DTLS timer to ensure retransmits due to lost packets are performed. However,
one peer will always complete a handshake before the other. The DTLS timer
stops once the handshake has finished so any handshake messages lost after
that point will not automatically get retransmitted simply by calling
DTLSv1_handle_timeout(). However attempting an SSL_read implies a
DTLSv1_handle_timeout() and additionally will process records received from
the peer. If those records are themselves retransmits then we know that the
peer has not completed its handshake yet and a retransmit of our final
flight automatically occurs.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8047)

show more ...


# 5c587fb6 09-Dec-2018 Kurt Roeckx

Use (D)TLS_MAX_VERSION_INTERNAL internally

Use 0 if we don't want to set a minimum or maximum version

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
GH: #7260


# 909f1a2e 06-Dec-2018 Richard Levitte

Following the license change, modify the boilerplates in test/

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7767)


# f1358634 16-Oct-2018 Matt Caswell

Add a test for duplicated DTLS records

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7414)


# edcd29ef 18-Oct-2018 Matt Caswell

Test DTLS cookie generation and verification

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7431)


12