#
e1eafe8c |
| 14-Apr-2022 |
Richard Levitte |
"Reserve" the method store when constructing methods Introducing the concept of reserving the store where a number of provided operation methods are to be stored. This avoids ra
"Reserve" the method store when constructing methods Introducing the concept of reserving the store where a number of provided operation methods are to be stored. This avoids racing when constructing provided methods, which is especially pertinent when multiple threads are trying to fetch the same method, or even any implementation for the same given operation type. This introduces a |biglock| in OSSL_METHOD_STORE, which is separate from the |lock| which is used for more internal and finer grained locking. Fixes #18152 Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18153)
show more ...
|
#
4b1b6297 |
| 09-May-2022 |
Tomas Mraz |
Always try to construct methods as new provider might be added Otherwise optional properties can be incorrectly ignored. Fixes #18262 Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openss
Always try to construct methods as new provider might be added Otherwise optional properties can be incorrectly ignored. Fixes #18262 Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18269)
show more ...
|
#
10937d58 |
| 20-Apr-2022 |
Richard Levitte |
Refactor method construction pre- and post-condition The existing pre- and post-condition functions are supposed to check if methods have already been created and stored, using provider
Refactor method construction pre- and post-condition The existing pre- and post-condition functions are supposed to check if methods have already been created and stored, using provider operation bits. This is supposed to only be done for "permanent" method stores. However, the way the pre-condition was called, it could not know if the set of implementations to be stored is likely to end up in a "permanent" or a temporary store. It needs access to the |no_store| flag returned by the provider's operation query function, because that call was done after the pre-condition was called. This requires a bit of refactoring, primarly of |algorithm_do_this()|, but also of |ossl_method_construct_precondition()|. Fixes #18150 Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18151)
show more ...
|
#
dc010ca6 |
| 04-Oct-2021 |
Richard Levitte |
CORE: Encure that cached fetches can be done per provider This mostly entails passing around a provider pointer, and handling queries that includes a pointer to a provider, where NULL me
CORE: Encure that cached fetches can be done per provider This mostly entails passing around a provider pointer, and handling queries that includes a pointer to a provider, where NULL means "any". This also means that there's a need to pass the provider pointer, not just down to the cache functions, but also be able to get it from ossl_method_store_fetch(). To this end, that function's OSSL_PROVIDER pointer argument is modified to be a pointer reference, so the function can answer back what provider the method comes from. Test added. Fixes #16614 Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16725)
show more ...
|
#
cfce50f7 |
| 30-Sep-2021 |
Richard Levitte |
CORE: add a provider argument to ossl_method_construct() This makes it possible to limit the search of methods to that particular provider. This uses already available possibilities in
CORE: add a provider argument to ossl_method_construct() This makes it possible to limit the search of methods to that particular provider. This uses already available possibilities in ossl_algorithm_do_all(). Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16725)
show more ...
|
#
6882652e |
| 15-Jun-2021 |
Richard Levitte |
CORE: Do a bit of cleanup of core fetching Some data, like the library context, were passed both through higher level callback structures and through arguments to those same higher l
CORE: Do a bit of cleanup of core fetching Some data, like the library context, were passed both through higher level callback structures and through arguments to those same higher level callbacks. This is a bit unnecessary, so we rearrange the callback arguments to simply pass that callback structure and rely on the higher level fetching functionality to pick out what data they need from that structure. Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15750)
show more ...
|
#
9067cf6c |
| 14-Jun-2021 |
Richard Levitte |
CORE: Move away the allocation of the temporary no_cache method store The responsibility for managing the temporary store for methods from algorithm implementations flaged "no_store" is
CORE: Move away the allocation of the temporary no_cache method store The responsibility for managing the temporary store for methods from algorithm implementations flaged "no_store" is moved up to the diverse method fetching functions. This allows them to allocate it "just in time", or in other words not at all if there is not such algorithm implementation. This makes this temporary store more flexible if it's needed outside of the core fetching functionality, and slightly faster when this temporary store isn't necessary at all. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15737)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha17, openssl-3.0.0-alpha16, openssl-3.0.0-alpha15, openssl-3.0.0-alpha14, OpenSSL_1_1_1k, openssl-3.0.0-alpha13, openssl-3.0.0-alpha12, OpenSSL_1_1_1j, openssl-3.0.0-alpha11 |
|
#
4333b89f |
| 28-Jan-2021 |
Richard Levitte |
Update copyright year Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13999)
|
#
b11ba50f |
| 12-Jan-2021 |
Matt Caswell |
Fix a failure where fetches can return NULL in multi-threaded code When a fetch is attempted simultaneously from multiple threads then both threads can attempt to construct the method. H
Fix a failure where fetches can return NULL in multi-threaded code When a fetch is attempted simultaneously from multiple threads then both threads can attempt to construct the method. However only one of those will get added to the global evp method store. The one that "lost" the race to add the method to the global evp method store ended up with the fetch call returning NULL, instead of returning the method that was already available. Fixes #13682 Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13660)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha10, OpenSSL_1_1_1i, openssl-3.0.0-alpha9, openssl-3.0.0-alpha8, openssl-3.0.0-alpha7 |
|
#
b4250010 |
| 15-Oct-2020 |
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre |
Rename OPENSSL_CTX prefix to OSSL_LIB_CTX Many of the new types introduced by OpenSSL 3.0 have an OSSL_ prefix, e.g., OSSL_CALLBACK, OSSL_PARAM, OSSL_ALGORITHM, OSSL_SERIALIZER.
Rename OPENSSL_CTX prefix to OSSL_LIB_CTX Many of the new types introduced by OpenSSL 3.0 have an OSSL_ prefix, e.g., OSSL_CALLBACK, OSSL_PARAM, OSSL_ALGORITHM, OSSL_SERIALIZER. The OPENSSL_CTX type stands out a little by using a different prefix. For consistency reasons, this type is renamed to OSSL_LIB_CTX. Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12621)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_1_1h, openssl-3.0.0-alpha6, openssl-3.0.0-alpha5, openssl-3.0.0-alpha4, openssl-3.0.0-alpha3 |
|
#
00c405b3 |
| 04-Jun-2020 |
Matt Caswell |
Update copyright year Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12043)
|
#
5a29b628 |
| 15-May-2020 |
Richard Levitte |
CORE: query for operations only once per provider (unless no_store is true) When a desired algorithm wasn't available, we didn't register anywhere that an attempt had been made, with the
CORE: query for operations only once per provider (unless no_store is true) When a desired algorithm wasn't available, we didn't register anywhere that an attempt had been made, with the result that next time the same attempt was made, the whole process would be done again. To avoid this churn, we register a bit for each operation that has been queried in the libcrypto provider object, and test it before trying the same query and method construction loop again. If course, if the provider has told us not to cache, we don't register this bit. Fixes #11814 Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11842)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha2, openssl-3.0.0-alpha1, OpenSSL_1_1_1g, OpenSSL_1_1_1f, OpenSSL_1_1_1e, OpenSSL_1_0_2u |
|
#
36fa4d8a |
| 19-Nov-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
CORE: pass the full algorithm definition to the method constructor So far, the API level method constructors that are called by ossl_method_construct_this() were passed the algorithm nam
CORE: pass the full algorithm definition to the method constructor So far, the API level method constructors that are called by ossl_method_construct_this() were passed the algorithm name string and the dispatch table and had no access to anything else. This change gives them access to the full OSSL_ALGORITHM item, thereby giving them access to the property definition. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10394)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_0_2t, OpenSSL_1_1_0l, OpenSSL_1_1_1d, OpenSSL_1_1_1c, OpenSSL_1_1_0k, OpenSSL_1_0_2s |
|
#
695d195b |
| 23-May-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
Replumbing: make it possible for providers to specify multiple names This modifies the treatment of algorithm name strings to allow multiple names separated with colons. Reviewe
Replumbing: make it possible for providers to specify multiple names This modifies the treatment of algorithm name strings to allow multiple names separated with colons. Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8985)
show more ...
|
#
f7c16d48 |
| 14-Sep-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
In provider implemented methods, save the name number, not the name string Multiple names per implementation is already supported in the namemap, but hasn't been used yet. However, as s
In provider implemented methods, save the name number, not the name string Multiple names per implementation is already supported in the namemap, but hasn't been used yet. However, as soon as we have multiple names, we will get an issue with what name should be saved in the method. The solution is to not save the name itself, but rather the number it's associated with. This number is supposed to be unique for each set of names, and we assume that algorithm names are globally unique, i.e. there can be no name overlap between different algorithm types. Incidently, it was also found that the 'get' function used by ossl_construct_method() doesn't need all the parameters it was given; most of what it needs, it can now get through the data structure given by the caller of ossl_construct_method(). As a consequence, ossl_construct_method() itself doesn't need all the parameters it was given either. There are some added internal functions that are expected to disappear as soon as legacy code is removed, such as evp_first_name() and ossl_namemap_num2name(). Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9897)
show more ...
|
#
c1d56231 |
| 21-Aug-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
Modify ossl_method_store_add() to accept an OSSL_PROVIDER and check for it If ossl_method_store_add() gets called with a method that already exists (i.e. the store has one with matching
Modify ossl_method_store_add() to accept an OSSL_PROVIDER and check for it If ossl_method_store_add() gets called with a method that already exists (i.e. the store has one with matching provider, nid and properties), that method should not be stored. We do this check inside ossl_method_store_add() because it has all the locking required to do so safely. Fixes #9561 Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9650)
show more ...
|
#
84d167f6 |
| 10-Jul-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
Refactor ossl_method_construct() in terms of ossl_algorithm_do_all() Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9356)
|
#
2ccb1b4e |
| 07-Jun-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
EVP fetching: make operation_id part of the method identity Because the operation identity wasn't integrated with the created methods, the following code would give unexpected results:
EVP fetching: make operation_id part of the method identity Because the operation identity wasn't integrated with the created methods, the following code would give unexpected results: EVP_MD *md = EVP_MD_fetch(NULL, "MD5", NULL); EVP_CIPHER *cipher = EVP_CIPHER_fetch(NULL, "MD5", NULL); if (md != NULL) printf("MD5 is a digest\n"); if (cipher != NULL) printf("MD5 is a cipher\n"); The message is that MD5 is both a digest and a cipher. Partially fixes #9106 Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9109)
show more ...
|
#
d5e5e2ff |
| 11-Apr-2019 |
Shane Lontis |
Move digests to providers Move digest code into the relevant providers (fips, default, legacy). The headers are temporarily moved to be internal, and will be moved into providers aft
Move digests to providers Move digest code into the relevant providers (fips, default, legacy). The headers are temporarily moved to be internal, and will be moved into providers after all external references are resolved. The deprecated digest code can not be removed until EVP_PKEY (signing) is supported by providers. EVP_MD data can also not yet be cleaned up for the same reasons. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8763)
show more ...
|
#
2e49c054 |
| 05-May-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
EVP_FETCH: deal with names without pre-defined NIDs We didn't deal very well with names that didn't have pre-defined NIDs, as the NID zero travelled through the full process and resulted
EVP_FETCH: deal with names without pre-defined NIDs We didn't deal very well with names that didn't have pre-defined NIDs, as the NID zero travelled through the full process and resulted in an inaccessible method. By consequence, we need to refactor the method construction callbacks to rely more on algorithm names. We must, however, still store the legacy NID with the method, for the sake of other code that depend on it (for example, CMS). Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8878)
show more ...
|
#
1aedc35f |
| 01-May-2019 |
Matt Caswell |
Instead of global data store it in an OPENSSL_CTX Various core and property related code files used global data. We should store all of that in an OPENSSL_CTX instead. Reviewed-
Instead of global data store it in an OPENSSL_CTX Various core and property related code files used global data. We should store all of that in an OPENSSL_CTX instead. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8857)
show more ...
|
#
dc46e3dd |
| 20-Mar-2019 |
Matt Caswell |
Use the right NID when putting a method in the store When we attempt to fetch a method with a given NID we will ask the providers for it if we don't already know about it. During that pr
Use the right NID when putting a method in the store When we attempt to fetch a method with a given NID we will ask the providers for it if we don't already know about it. During that process we may be told about other methods with a different NID. We need to make sure we don't confuse the two. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8541)
show more ...
|
#
a3830831 |
| 14-Mar-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
Replumbing: better reference counter control in ossl_method_construct() Fully assume that the method constructors use reference counting. Otherwise, we may leak memory, or loose track an
Replumbing: better reference counter control in ossl_method_construct() Fully assume that the method constructors use reference counting. Otherwise, we may leak memory, or loose track and do a double free. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8341)
show more ...
|
#
7bb19a0f |
| 13-Mar-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
Replumbing: pass callback data to the algo destructor too All relevant OSSL_METHOD_CONSTRUCT_METHOD callbacks got the callback data passed to them, except 'destruct'. There's no reason
Replumbing: pass callback data to the algo destructor too All relevant OSSL_METHOD_CONSTRUCT_METHOD callbacks got the callback data passed to them, except 'destruct'. There's no reason why it shouldn't get that pointer passed, so we make a small adjustment. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8341)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_0_2r, OpenSSL_1_1_1b |
|
#
9e11fe0d |
| 25-Feb-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
Replumbing: Add constructor of libcrypto internal method structures This queries the provider for its available functionality (unless a matching method structured is already cached, in w
Replumbing: Add constructor of libcrypto internal method structures This queries the provider for its available functionality (unless a matching method structured is already cached, in which case that's used instead), and creates method structure with the help of a passed constructor. The result is cached if the provider allows it (or if caching is forced). Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8340)
show more ...
|