History log of /PHP-8.3/Zend/tests/readonly_function.phpt (Results 1 – 2 of 2)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# 08b75395 08-Sep-2022 Ilija Tovilo

Fix syntax error when dnf type in parens after readonly

Fixes GH-9500
Closes GH-9512


Revision tags: php-8.2.0RC1, php-8.1.10, php-8.0.23, php-8.0.23RC1, php-8.1.10RC1, php-8.2.0beta3, php-8.2.0beta2, php-8.1.9, php-8.0.22, php-8.1.9RC1, php-8.2.0beta1, php-8.0.22RC1, php-8.0.21, php-8.1.8, php-8.2.0alpha3, php-8.1.8RC1, php-8.2.0alpha2, php-8.0.21RC1, php-8.0.20, php-8.1.7, php-8.2.0alpha1, php-7.4.30, php-8.1.7RC1, php-8.0.20RC1, php-8.1.6, php-8.0.19, php-8.1.6RC1, php-8.0.19RC1, php-8.0.18, php-8.1.5, php-7.4.29, php-8.1.5RC1, php-8.0.18RC1, php-8.1.4, php-8.0.17, php-8.1.4RC1, php-8.0.17RC1, php-8.1.3, php-8.0.16, php-7.4.28, php-8.1.3RC1, php-8.0.16RC1, php-8.1.2, php-8.0.15, php-8.1.2RC1, php-8.0.15RC1, php-8.0.14, php-8.1.1, php-7.4.27, php-8.1.1RC1, php-8.0.14RC1, php-7.4.27RC1, php-8.1.0, php-8.0.13, php-7.4.26, php-7.3.33, php-8.1.0RC6, php-7.4.26RC1, php-8.0.13RC1, php-8.1.0RC5, php-7.3.32, php-7.4.25, php-8.0.12, php-8.1.0RC4, php-8.0.12RC1, php-7.4.25RC1, php-8.1.0RC3, php-8.0.11, php-7.4.24, php-7.3.31, php-8.1.0RC2, php-7.4.24RC1, php-8.0.11RC1
# 76348f33 06-Sep-2021 Nikita Popov

Allow using readonly as function name

Don't treat "readonly" as a keyword if followed by "(". This
allows using it as a global function name. In particular, this
function has been us

Allow using readonly as function name

Don't treat "readonly" as a keyword if followed by "(". This
allows using it as a global function name. In particular, this
function has been used by WordPress.

This does not allow other uses of "readonly", in particular it
cannot be used as a class name, unlike "enum". The reason is that
we'd still have to recognize it as a keyword when using in a type
position:

class Test {
public ReadOnly $foo;
}

This should now be interpreted as a readonly property, not as a
read-write property with type `ReadOnly`. As such, a class with
name `ReadOnly`, while unambiguous in most other circumstances,
would not be usable as property or parameter type. For that
reason, we do not support it at all.

show more ...