|
Revision tags: php-8.1.7RC1, php-8.1.4RC1, php-8.1.3, php-8.1.2RC1, php-8.1.0, php-7.3.33, php-7.3.32 |
|
| #
866adb12 |
| 15-Oct-2021 |
Christoph M. Becker |
Fix #81500: Interval serialization regression since 7.3.14 / 7.4.2
While it may not be desired, `DateInterval::$f` supports negative
values, at least with regard to calculations. We sti
Fix #81500: Interval serialization regression since 7.3.14 / 7.4.2
While it may not be desired, `DateInterval::$f` supports negative
values, at least with regard to calculations. We still need to guard
from assigning double values which are out of range for signed 64bit
integers (which would be undefined behavior). zend_dval_to_lval() does
this by returning `0` instead of triggering UB. This way we can avoid
setting the invalid marker, which doesn't work as expected anyway.
We must not do that only for unserialization, but also when the property
is set in the first place.
We need to adapt some of the existing tests wrt. this behavior. In
particular, we check for an arbitrary value in bug79015.phpt, to cater
to differences between 32bit and 64bit architectures.
Closes GH-7575.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: php-7.3.31, php-7.3.30, php-7.3.29, php-7.3.28, php-7.3.27, php-7.3.26, php-7.3.26RC1, php-7.3.25, php-7.3.25RC1, php-7.3.24, php-7.3.24RC1, php-7.3.23, php-7.3.23RC1, php-7.3.22, php-7.3.22RC1, php-7.3.21, php-7.3.21RC1, php-7.3.20, php-7.3.20RC1, php-7.3.19, php-7.4.7RC1, php-7.3.19RC1, php-7.3.18RC1, php-7.2.30, php-7.3.17, php-7.3.17RC1, php-7.3.18, php-7.3.16, php-7.3.16RC1, php-7.3.15RC1, php-7.3.15, php-7.3.14, php-7.3.14RC1 |
|
| #
b48f2625 |
| 23-Dec-2019 |
Christoph M. Becker |
Fix #79015: undefined-behavior in php_date.c
We check that the given microsecond fraction is in the valid range
[0, 1000000[, and otherwise mark it as invalid. We also drop the
usel
Fix #79015: undefined-behavior in php_date.c
We check that the given microsecond fraction is in the valid range
[0, 1000000[, and otherwise mark it as invalid. We also drop the
useless do loop; a plain block is sufficient here.
show more ...
|
