History log of /PHP-8.3/Zend/tests/unreachable_phi_cycle.phpt (Results 1 – 2 of 2)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# d8696f92 17-Jul-2023 George Peter Banyard

[RFC] Path to Saner Increment/Decrement operators (#10358)

* Add behavioural tests for incdec operators

* Add support to ++/-- for objects castable to _IS_NUMBER

* Add str_

[RFC] Path to Saner Increment/Decrement operators (#10358)

* Add behavioural tests for incdec operators

* Add support to ++/-- for objects castable to _IS_NUMBER

* Add str_increment() function

* Add str_decrement() function

RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/saner-inc-dec-operators

Co-authored-by: Ilija Tovilo <ilija.tovilo@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Arnaud Le Blanc <arnaud.lb@gmail.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: php-8.2.0RC1, php-8.1.10, php-8.0.23, php-8.0.23RC1, php-8.1.10RC1, php-8.2.0beta3, php-8.2.0beta2, php-8.1.9, php-8.0.22, php-8.1.9RC1, php-8.2.0beta1, php-8.0.22RC1, php-8.0.21, php-8.1.8, php-8.2.0alpha3, php-8.1.8RC1, php-8.2.0alpha2, php-8.0.21RC1, php-8.0.20, php-8.1.7, php-8.2.0alpha1, php-7.4.30, php-8.1.7RC1, php-8.0.20RC1, php-8.1.6, php-8.0.19, php-8.1.6RC1, php-8.0.19RC1, php-8.0.18, php-8.1.5, php-7.4.29, php-8.1.5RC1, php-8.0.18RC1, php-8.1.4, php-8.0.17, php-8.1.4RC1, php-8.0.17RC1, php-8.1.3, php-8.0.16, php-7.4.28, php-8.1.3RC1, php-8.0.16RC1, php-8.1.2, php-8.0.15, php-8.1.2RC1, php-8.0.15RC1, php-8.0.14, php-8.1.1, php-7.4.27, php-8.1.1RC1, php-8.0.14RC1, php-7.4.27RC1, php-8.1.0, php-8.0.13, php-7.4.26, php-7.3.33, php-8.1.0RC6, php-7.4.26RC1, php-8.0.13RC1, php-8.1.0RC5, php-7.3.32, php-7.4.25, php-8.0.12, php-8.1.0RC4, php-8.0.12RC1, php-7.4.25RC1, php-8.1.0RC3
# ddf89102 27-Sep-2021 Nikita Popov

Fix DCE of unreachable phi in cycle

We can't remove a trivial phi of the form x = phi(x), because we
don't have a replacement value. We could drop the whole block
though. SCCP would

Fix DCE of unreachable phi in cycle

We can't remove a trivial phi of the form x = phi(x), because we
don't have a replacement value. We could drop the whole block
though. SCCP would normally do this, but in this particular case
we only determine non-reachability based on type information.

Fixes oss-fuzz #39316.

show more ...