History log of /openssl/crypto/srp/srp_vfy.c (Results 1 – 25 of 67)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# 792b2c8d 09-Oct-2024 Niels Dossche <7771979+nielsdos@users.noreply.github.com>

Fix potential double free through SRP_user_pwd_set1_ids()

If SRP_user_pwd_set1_ids() fails during one of the duplications, or id
is NULL, then the old pointer values are still stored but

Fix potential double free through SRP_user_pwd_set1_ids()

If SRP_user_pwd_set1_ids() fails during one of the duplications, or id
is NULL, then the old pointer values are still stored but they are now dangling.
Later when SRP_user_pwd_free() is called these are freed again,
leading to a double free.

Although there are no such uses in OpenSSL as far as I found,
it's still a public API.

CLA: trivial

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25655)

show more ...


# 3ef1b742 13-Sep-2024 Зишан Мирза

Check file name for not being NULL before opening it

Fixes #24416

Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from h

Check file name for not being NULL before opening it

Fixes #24416

Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25458)

show more ...


# 556009c5 28-Sep-2023 Matt Caswell

Copyright year updates


Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Release: yes


# 68e95f78 06-Sep-2023 Bernd Edlinger

Fix a possible memleak in SRP_VBASE_new

In the error handling case the memory in
vb->users_pwd was accidentally not released.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Revi

Fix a possible memleak in SRP_VBASE_new

In the error handling case the memory in
vb->users_pwd was accidentally not released.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21981)

show more ...


# f44d32fd 18-Oct-2022 xkernel

add a check for the return of sk_SRP_gN_new_null() so that capture the potential memory error in time

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.or

add a check for the return of sk_SRP_gN_new_null() so that capture the potential memory error in time

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19435)

show more ...


# e077455e 29-Sep-2022 Richard Levitte

Stop raising ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE in most places

Since OPENSSL_malloc() and friends report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE, and
at least handle the file name and line number they are called from,

Stop raising ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE in most places

Since OPENSSL_malloc() and friends report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE, and
at least handle the file name and line number they are called from,
there's no need to report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE where they are called
directly, or when SSLfatal() and RLAYERfatal() is used, the reason
`ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE` is changed to `ERR_R_CRYPTO_LIB`.

There were a number of places where `ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE` was reported
even though it was a function from a different sub-system that was
called. Those places are changed to report ERR_R_{lib}_LIB, where
{lib} is the name of that sub-system.
Some of them are tricky to get right, as we have a lot of functions
that belong in the ASN1 sub-system, and all the `sk_` calls or from
the CRYPTO sub-system.

Some extra adaptation was necessary where there were custom OPENSSL_malloc()
wrappers, and some bugs are fixed alongside these changes.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19301)

show more ...


# 1287dabd 26-Oct-2021 x2018

fix some code with obvious wrong coding style

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org

fix some code with obvious wrong coding style

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16918)

show more ...


# 5cbd2ea3 28-May-2021 Pauli

add zero strenght arguments to BN and RAND RNG calls

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15513)


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha17, openssl-3.0.0-alpha16, openssl-3.0.0-alpha15
# 42e7d043 15-Apr-2021 Pauli

srp: remove references to EVP_sha1()

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14881)


# b06450bc 18-Apr-2021 Pauli

srp: fix double free,

In function SRP_create_verifier_ex, it calls SRP_create_verifier_BN_ex(..., &v, ..) at line 653.
In the implementation of SRP_create_verifier_BN_ex(), *verify (whic

srp: fix double free,

In function SRP_create_verifier_ex, it calls SRP_create_verifier_BN_ex(..., &v, ..) at line 653.
In the implementation of SRP_create_verifier_BN_ex(), *verify (which is the paremeter of v) is allocated a pointer via BN_new() at line 738.
And *verify is freed via BN_clear_free() at line 743, and return 0.
Then the execution continues up to goto err at line 655, and the freed v is freed again at line 687.

Bug reported by @Yunlongs

Fixes #14913

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14921)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha14, OpenSSL_1_1_1k, openssl-3.0.0-alpha13, openssl-3.0.0-alpha12
# a28d06f3 18-Feb-2021 Matt Caswell

Update copyright year

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14235)


Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_1_1j
# 6d2a1eff 05-Feb-2021 Matt Caswell

Deprecate the low level SRP APIs

The OTC decided that all low level APIs should be deprecated. This extends
to SRP, even though at the current time there is no "EVP" interface to it.

Deprecate the low level SRP APIs

The OTC decided that all low level APIs should be deprecated. This extends
to SRP, even though at the current time there is no "EVP" interface to it.
This could be added in a future release.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14132)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha11, openssl-3.0.0-alpha10, OpenSSL_1_1_1i, openssl-3.0.0-alpha9, openssl-3.0.0-alpha8
# 9311d0c4 04-Nov-2020 Richard Levitte

Convert all {NAME}err() in crypto/ to their corresponding ERR_raise() call

This includes error reporting for libcrypto sub-libraries in surprising
places.

This was done using ut

Convert all {NAME}err() in crypto/ to their corresponding ERR_raise() call

This includes error reporting for libcrypto sub-libraries in surprising
places.

This was done using util/err-to-raise

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13318)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha7
# b4250010 15-Oct-2020 Dr. Matthias St. Pierre

Rename OPENSSL_CTX prefix to OSSL_LIB_CTX

Many of the new types introduced by OpenSSL 3.0 have an OSSL_ prefix,
e.g., OSSL_CALLBACK, OSSL_PARAM, OSSL_ALGORITHM, OSSL_SERIALIZER.

Rename OPENSSL_CTX prefix to OSSL_LIB_CTX

Many of the new types introduced by OpenSSL 3.0 have an OSSL_ prefix,
e.g., OSSL_CALLBACK, OSSL_PARAM, OSSL_ALGORITHM, OSSL_SERIALIZER.

The OPENSSL_CTX type stands out a little by using a different prefix.
For consistency reasons, this type is renamed to OSSL_LIB_CTX.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12621)

show more ...


Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_1_1h
# 22fbfe6a 03-Sep-2020 Matt Caswell

Fix safestack issues in srp.h

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12

Fix safestack issues in srp.h

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12781)

show more ...


Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha6, openssl-3.0.0-alpha5, openssl-3.0.0-alpha4, openssl-3.0.0-alpha3, openssl-3.0.0-alpha2, openssl-3.0.0-alpha1, OpenSSL_1_1_1g, OpenSSL_1_1_1f, OpenSSL_1_1_1e, OpenSSL_1_0_2u
# 852c2ed2 19-Dec-2019 Rich Salz

In OpenSSL builds, declare STACK for datatypes ...

... and only *define* them in the source files that need them.
Use DEFINE_OR_DECLARE which is set appropriately for internal builds

In OpenSSL builds, declare STACK for datatypes ...

... and only *define* them in the source files that need them.
Use DEFINE_OR_DECLARE which is set appropriately for internal builds
and not non-deprecated builds.

Deprecate stack-of-block

Better documentation

Move some ASN1 struct typedefs to types.h

Update ParseC to handle this. Most of all, ParseC needed to be more
consistent. The handlers are "recursive", in so far that they are called
again and again until they terminate, which depends entirely on what the
"massager" returns. There's a comment at the beginning of ParseC that
explains how that works. {Richard Levtte}

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10669)

show more ...


# 33388b44 23-Apr-2020 Matt Caswell

Update copyright year

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11616)


# e85982c7 20-Mar-2020 Matt Caswell

Make SRP library context aware

In order for the TLS SRP tests to pass when using a non-default library
context the underlying SRP calls need to be library context aware.

Reviewe

Make SRP library context aware

In order for the TLS SRP tests to pass when using a non-default library
context the underlying SRP calls need to be library context aware.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11410)

show more ...


# 00db8c60 05-Nov-2019 Richard Levitte

Update source files for pre-3.0 deprecation

Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10364)


# 25f2138b 27-Sep-2019 Dr. Matthias St. Pierre

Reorganize private crypto header files

Currently, there are two different directories which contain internal
header files of libcrypto which are meant to be shared internally:

W

Reorganize private crypto header files

Currently, there are two different directories which contain internal
header files of libcrypto which are meant to be shared internally:

While header files in 'include/internal' are intended to be shared
between libcrypto and libssl, the files in 'crypto/include/internal'
are intended to be shared inside libcrypto only.

To make things complicated, the include search path is set up in such
a way that the directive #include "internal/file.h" could refer to
a file in either of these two directoroes. This makes it necessary
in some cases to add a '_int.h' suffix to some files to resolve this
ambiguity:

#include "internal/file.h" # located in 'include/internal'
#include "internal/file_int.h" # located in 'crypto/include/internal'

This commit moves the private crypto headers from

'crypto/include/internal' to 'include/crypto'

As a result, the include directives become unambiguous

#include "internal/file.h" # located in 'include/internal'
#include "crypto/file.h" # located in 'include/crypto'

hence the superfluous '_int.h' suffixes can be stripped.

The files 'store_int.h' and 'store.h' need to be treated specially;
they are joined into a single file.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9333)

show more ...


Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_0_2t, OpenSSL_1_1_0l, OpenSSL_1_1_1d, OpenSSL_1_1_1c, OpenSSL_1_1_0k, OpenSSL_1_0_2s, OpenSSL_1_0_2r, OpenSSL_1_1_1b
# df443918 31-Jan-2019 Sam Roberts

Remove unnecessary trailing whitespace

Trim trailing whitespace. It doesn't match OpenSSL coding standards,
AFAICT, and it can cause problems with git tooling.

Trailing whitespa

Remove unnecessary trailing whitespace

Trim trailing whitespace. It doesn't match OpenSSL coding standards,
AFAICT, and it can cause problems with git tooling.

Trailing whitespace remains in test data and external source.

Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8092)

show more ...


# d63bde78 14-Jan-2019 Matt Caswell

Check more return values in the SRP code

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8019)


# 0a5bda63 14-Jan-2019 Matt Caswell

Check a return value in the SRP code

Spotted by OSTIF audit

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8019)


# 7428b99b 06-Dec-2018 Richard Levitte

Following the license change, modify the boilerplates in crypto/srp/

[skip ci]

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/

Following the license change, modify the boilerplates in crypto/srp/

[skip ci]

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7819)

show more ...


# fcd2d5a6 29-Nov-2018 Richard Levitte

Refactor the computation of API version limits

Previously, the API version limit was indicated with a numeric version
number. This was "natural" in the pre-3.0.0 because the version was

Refactor the computation of API version limits

Previously, the API version limit was indicated with a numeric version
number. This was "natural" in the pre-3.0.0 because the version was
this simple number.

With 3.0.0, the version is divided into three separate numbers, and
it's only the major number that counts, but we still need to be able
to support pre-3.0.0 version limits.

Therefore, we allow OPENSSL_API_COMPAT to be defined with a pre-3.0.0
style numeric version number or with a simple major number, i.e. can
be defined like this for any application:

-D OPENSSL_API_COMPAT=0x10100000L
-D OPENSSL_API_COMPAT=3

Since the pre-3.0.0 numerical version numbers are high, it's easy to
distinguish between a simple major number and a pre-3.0.0 numerical
version number and to thereby support both forms at the same time.

Internally, we define the following macros depending on the value of
OPENSSL_API_COMPAT:

OPENSSL_API_0_9_8
OPENSSL_API_1_0_0
OPENSSL_API_1_1_0
OPENSSL_API_3

They indicate that functions marked for deprecation in the
corresponding major release shall not be built if defined.

Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7724)

show more ...


123