#
792b2c8d |
| 09-Oct-2024 |
Niels Dossche <7771979+nielsdos@users.noreply.github.com> |
Fix potential double free through SRP_user_pwd_set1_ids() If SRP_user_pwd_set1_ids() fails during one of the duplications, or id is NULL, then the old pointer values are still stored but
Fix potential double free through SRP_user_pwd_set1_ids() If SRP_user_pwd_set1_ids() fails during one of the duplications, or id is NULL, then the old pointer values are still stored but they are now dangling. Later when SRP_user_pwd_free() is called these are freed again, leading to a double free. Although there are no such uses in OpenSSL as far as I found, it's still a public API. CLA: trivial Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25655)
show more ...
|
#
3ef1b742 |
| 13-Sep-2024 |
Зишан Мирза |
Check file name for not being NULL before opening it Fixes #24416 Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from h
Check file name for not being NULL before opening it Fixes #24416 Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25458)
show more ...
|
#
556009c5 |
| 28-Sep-2023 |
Matt Caswell |
Copyright year updates Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Release: yes
|
#
68e95f78 |
| 06-Sep-2023 |
Bernd Edlinger |
Fix a possible memleak in SRP_VBASE_new In the error handling case the memory in vb->users_pwd was accidentally not released. Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> Revi
Fix a possible memleak in SRP_VBASE_new In the error handling case the memory in vb->users_pwd was accidentally not released. Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21981)
show more ...
|
#
f44d32fd |
| 18-Oct-2022 |
xkernel |
add a check for the return of sk_SRP_gN_new_null() so that capture the potential memory error in time Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.or
add a check for the return of sk_SRP_gN_new_null() so that capture the potential memory error in time Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19435)
show more ...
|
#
e077455e |
| 29-Sep-2022 |
Richard Levitte |
Stop raising ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE in most places Since OPENSSL_malloc() and friends report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE, and at least handle the file name and line number they are called from,
Stop raising ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE in most places Since OPENSSL_malloc() and friends report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE, and at least handle the file name and line number they are called from, there's no need to report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE where they are called directly, or when SSLfatal() and RLAYERfatal() is used, the reason `ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE` is changed to `ERR_R_CRYPTO_LIB`. There were a number of places where `ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE` was reported even though it was a function from a different sub-system that was called. Those places are changed to report ERR_R_{lib}_LIB, where {lib} is the name of that sub-system. Some of them are tricky to get right, as we have a lot of functions that belong in the ASN1 sub-system, and all the `sk_` calls or from the CRYPTO sub-system. Some extra adaptation was necessary where there were custom OPENSSL_malloc() wrappers, and some bugs are fixed alongside these changes. Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19301)
show more ...
|
#
1287dabd |
| 26-Oct-2021 |
x2018 |
fix some code with obvious wrong coding style Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org
fix some code with obvious wrong coding style Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16918)
show more ...
|
#
5cbd2ea3 |
| 28-May-2021 |
Pauli |
add zero strenght arguments to BN and RAND RNG calls Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15513)
|
Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha17, openssl-3.0.0-alpha16, openssl-3.0.0-alpha15 |
|
#
42e7d043 |
| 15-Apr-2021 |
Pauli |
srp: remove references to EVP_sha1() Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14881)
|
#
b06450bc |
| 18-Apr-2021 |
Pauli |
srp: fix double free, In function SRP_create_verifier_ex, it calls SRP_create_verifier_BN_ex(..., &v, ..) at line 653. In the implementation of SRP_create_verifier_BN_ex(), *verify (whic
srp: fix double free, In function SRP_create_verifier_ex, it calls SRP_create_verifier_BN_ex(..., &v, ..) at line 653. In the implementation of SRP_create_verifier_BN_ex(), *verify (which is the paremeter of v) is allocated a pointer via BN_new() at line 738. And *verify is freed via BN_clear_free() at line 743, and return 0. Then the execution continues up to goto err at line 655, and the freed v is freed again at line 687. Bug reported by @Yunlongs Fixes #14913 Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14921)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha14, OpenSSL_1_1_1k, openssl-3.0.0-alpha13, openssl-3.0.0-alpha12 |
|
#
a28d06f3 |
| 18-Feb-2021 |
Matt Caswell |
Update copyright year Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14235)
|
Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_1_1j |
|
#
6d2a1eff |
| 05-Feb-2021 |
Matt Caswell |
Deprecate the low level SRP APIs The OTC decided that all low level APIs should be deprecated. This extends to SRP, even though at the current time there is no "EVP" interface to it.
Deprecate the low level SRP APIs The OTC decided that all low level APIs should be deprecated. This extends to SRP, even though at the current time there is no "EVP" interface to it. This could be added in a future release. Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14132)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha11, openssl-3.0.0-alpha10, OpenSSL_1_1_1i, openssl-3.0.0-alpha9, openssl-3.0.0-alpha8 |
|
#
9311d0c4 |
| 04-Nov-2020 |
Richard Levitte |
Convert all {NAME}err() in crypto/ to their corresponding ERR_raise() call This includes error reporting for libcrypto sub-libraries in surprising places. This was done using ut
Convert all {NAME}err() in crypto/ to their corresponding ERR_raise() call This includes error reporting for libcrypto sub-libraries in surprising places. This was done using util/err-to-raise Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13318)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha7 |
|
#
b4250010 |
| 15-Oct-2020 |
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre |
Rename OPENSSL_CTX prefix to OSSL_LIB_CTX Many of the new types introduced by OpenSSL 3.0 have an OSSL_ prefix, e.g., OSSL_CALLBACK, OSSL_PARAM, OSSL_ALGORITHM, OSSL_SERIALIZER.
Rename OPENSSL_CTX prefix to OSSL_LIB_CTX Many of the new types introduced by OpenSSL 3.0 have an OSSL_ prefix, e.g., OSSL_CALLBACK, OSSL_PARAM, OSSL_ALGORITHM, OSSL_SERIALIZER. The OPENSSL_CTX type stands out a little by using a different prefix. For consistency reasons, this type is renamed to OSSL_LIB_CTX. Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12621)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_1_1h |
|
#
22fbfe6a |
| 03-Sep-2020 |
Matt Caswell |
Fix safestack issues in srp.h Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12
Fix safestack issues in srp.h Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12781)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: openssl-3.0.0-alpha6, openssl-3.0.0-alpha5, openssl-3.0.0-alpha4, openssl-3.0.0-alpha3, openssl-3.0.0-alpha2, openssl-3.0.0-alpha1, OpenSSL_1_1_1g, OpenSSL_1_1_1f, OpenSSL_1_1_1e, OpenSSL_1_0_2u |
|
#
852c2ed2 |
| 19-Dec-2019 |
Rich Salz |
In OpenSSL builds, declare STACK for datatypes ... ... and only *define* them in the source files that need them. Use DEFINE_OR_DECLARE which is set appropriately for internal builds
In OpenSSL builds, declare STACK for datatypes ... ... and only *define* them in the source files that need them. Use DEFINE_OR_DECLARE which is set appropriately for internal builds and not non-deprecated builds. Deprecate stack-of-block Better documentation Move some ASN1 struct typedefs to types.h Update ParseC to handle this. Most of all, ParseC needed to be more consistent. The handlers are "recursive", in so far that they are called again and again until they terminate, which depends entirely on what the "massager" returns. There's a comment at the beginning of ParseC that explains how that works. {Richard Levtte} Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10669)
show more ...
|
#
33388b44 |
| 23-Apr-2020 |
Matt Caswell |
Update copyright year Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11616)
|
#
e85982c7 |
| 20-Mar-2020 |
Matt Caswell |
Make SRP library context aware In order for the TLS SRP tests to pass when using a non-default library context the underlying SRP calls need to be library context aware. Reviewe
Make SRP library context aware In order for the TLS SRP tests to pass when using a non-default library context the underlying SRP calls need to be library context aware. Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11410)
show more ...
|
#
00db8c60 |
| 05-Nov-2019 |
Richard Levitte |
Update source files for pre-3.0 deprecation Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10364)
|
#
25f2138b |
| 27-Sep-2019 |
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre |
Reorganize private crypto header files Currently, there are two different directories which contain internal header files of libcrypto which are meant to be shared internally: W
Reorganize private crypto header files Currently, there are two different directories which contain internal header files of libcrypto which are meant to be shared internally: While header files in 'include/internal' are intended to be shared between libcrypto and libssl, the files in 'crypto/include/internal' are intended to be shared inside libcrypto only. To make things complicated, the include search path is set up in such a way that the directive #include "internal/file.h" could refer to a file in either of these two directoroes. This makes it necessary in some cases to add a '_int.h' suffix to some files to resolve this ambiguity: #include "internal/file.h" # located in 'include/internal' #include "internal/file_int.h" # located in 'crypto/include/internal' This commit moves the private crypto headers from 'crypto/include/internal' to 'include/crypto' As a result, the include directives become unambiguous #include "internal/file.h" # located in 'include/internal' #include "crypto/file.h" # located in 'include/crypto' hence the superfluous '_int.h' suffixes can be stripped. The files 'store_int.h' and 'store.h' need to be treated specially; they are joined into a single file. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9333)
show more ...
|
Revision tags: OpenSSL_1_0_2t, OpenSSL_1_1_0l, OpenSSL_1_1_1d, OpenSSL_1_1_1c, OpenSSL_1_1_0k, OpenSSL_1_0_2s, OpenSSL_1_0_2r, OpenSSL_1_1_1b |
|
#
df443918 |
| 31-Jan-2019 |
Sam Roberts |
Remove unnecessary trailing whitespace Trim trailing whitespace. It doesn't match OpenSSL coding standards, AFAICT, and it can cause problems with git tooling. Trailing whitespa
Remove unnecessary trailing whitespace Trim trailing whitespace. It doesn't match OpenSSL coding standards, AFAICT, and it can cause problems with git tooling. Trailing whitespace remains in test data and external source. Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8092)
show more ...
|
#
d63bde78 |
| 14-Jan-2019 |
Matt Caswell |
Check more return values in the SRP code Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8019)
|
#
0a5bda63 |
| 14-Jan-2019 |
Matt Caswell |
Check a return value in the SRP code Spotted by OSTIF audit Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8019)
|
#
7428b99b |
| 06-Dec-2018 |
Richard Levitte |
Following the license change, modify the boilerplates in crypto/srp/ [skip ci] Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/
Following the license change, modify the boilerplates in crypto/srp/ [skip ci] Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7819)
show more ...
|
#
fcd2d5a6 |
| 29-Nov-2018 |
Richard Levitte |
Refactor the computation of API version limits Previously, the API version limit was indicated with a numeric version number. This was "natural" in the pre-3.0.0 because the version was
Refactor the computation of API version limits Previously, the API version limit was indicated with a numeric version number. This was "natural" in the pre-3.0.0 because the version was this simple number. With 3.0.0, the version is divided into three separate numbers, and it's only the major number that counts, but we still need to be able to support pre-3.0.0 version limits. Therefore, we allow OPENSSL_API_COMPAT to be defined with a pre-3.0.0 style numeric version number or with a simple major number, i.e. can be defined like this for any application: -D OPENSSL_API_COMPAT=0x10100000L -D OPENSSL_API_COMPAT=3 Since the pre-3.0.0 numerical version numbers are high, it's easy to distinguish between a simple major number and a pre-3.0.0 numerical version number and to thereby support both forms at the same time. Internally, we define the following macros depending on the value of OPENSSL_API_COMPAT: OPENSSL_API_0_9_8 OPENSSL_API_1_0_0 OPENSSL_API_1_1_0 OPENSSL_API_3 They indicate that functions marked for deprecation in the corresponding major release shall not be built if defined. Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7724)
show more ...
|